From Borehamwood, the nightly show continues its heavily structured way through the week. BBOTS staggers from evening to evening with its random mix of generally irritating and occasionally informative guests. Emma enjoys herself, which she does well; and Jamie irritates most people, but that may be his forte. We have been allocated some Live feed after evictions. Not a lot, but some at least. That is what comes our way via TV.
Social media - specifically Facebook and and Twitter are unmitigated drivel. The video clips linked back though Facebook are pointless. The topics in FB and the Tweets are so pathetic it would be funny if it were not for the fact that very well paid and powerful people allegedly believe it is a good idea and a valid replacement for what the fans actually want. The newspapers and magazines owned by Desmond cover the programme, but few people read them. The other papers and magazines largely ignore it.
The other place the show exists is in the fan community. The fans are held together by two things, the love of the show and the desire to persuade Desmond and his patronising team that we are right and he is wrong. The fan base that the show has generated for years continues on forums and chat rooms but the information paucity has led to a significant drop in the amount of 'water cooler' chats and office discussions that increased the viewer numbers in years gone by.
So, what have we discussed and what have we learned?
Firstly we have discussed the absence of real Live Feed which is seen as an unwelcome opportunity for the production team to be dishonest and manipulative of story-lines shown. The subject of Live Feed has not gone away regardless of Channel 5 and the attempts of Jamie East to belittle anyone who brought the subject up on his BBOTS segment. Jamie has said since that it was an attempt at humour but if true he lacks the comedic touch in some matters. Generally speaking asking someone their opinion on something and then hanging up when they respond is considered bad manners. Live feed has obtained the largest figures ever for 5* and beat the viewer figures for BBOTS. The numbers (not far short of a million) were achieved despite the miniscule length of the broadcasts. The segments were also broadcast right after evictions, a time when the HMs are normally principally concerned with getting out into the garden to smoke.
The mix of Housemates was eclectic to say the least. The claims of Natasha, Frankie and Andrew to any kind of celebrity status are not strong - they (especially Frankie) were plainly out of their depth.
There did not seem to be a significant USA/UK divide except at the level of game play. The twins by virtue of who they are and their background were absolutely determined to play the game US style and did it very well. They know well that their price in the market place is determined by what they do and what they reveal (or don't). The twins were conspiratorial, devious and Machiavellian at times and kept enough clothes on to preserve their market value. I never warmed to them and they are unlikely to win but good game Kristina and Karissa.
Michael Madsen was rightly held in awe by the rest of the HMs. He is the only real celebrity in the house and I hope his fee reflects that. He (with his supporting actors) supplied much of the entertainment. Good game Michael.
Nicola was exactly as we imagined her to be, shrewd, grasping and self centred. Whether cleaning the house to get air time, weeping over the children she chose to leave behind, playing to the cameras in the DR or shredding the other HM's letters from home it was all about her. She won't win but she played well for her moment in the spotlight.
Denise revealed herself to be a truly troubled soul as her background suggests she is. She was foolish to get involved in the show. Romeo came across well whenever we got to see him. Gareth is the likely winner and has been since day one. Kirk was fairly unpleasant and slightly ugly of spirit, and Georgia was pleasant and pretty of face. Perhaps there was more to them, perhaps not.
Natalie has probably done herself not too much harm by going in. Her alliances in the house may have cost her a place on the final eviction night.
Housemates' standards of behaviour seem far lower. For example, in the last series we were belatedly given the information about 'Freezergate'. We found out only because the efforts of C5 and Jamie East to silence Heaven were not successful. In this series Denise certainly raised her fist in Michael's face, which would have been threatening behaviour when C4 ran the show. The show may be above reproach, or it could be as unsavoury as BB Brazil, we will never know. In Brazil it was Live feed which enabled the production team to be belatedly held to task. Possibly under C5 management, external scrutiny is to be avoided. Certainly Richard Desmond has no intention of subjecting his newspapers to Press Complaints Council scrutiny either.
Poor behaviour is also amplified by another change under the C5 stewardship - the shopping budget task which is now a farce. It is futile to pretend that there is any intention of not supplying food and alcoholic drinks to the HMs every single night. There is no doubt in my mind that the aim of the production team is to ensure that there is every chance of drunken frolics every night, for there is not much frolicking with tired HMs on a diet of water and chick peas. However the stark warning of BB Brazil should be kept in the minds of the team. And of course, alcohol does not only lead to chance sexual encounters, it also leads to verbal violence and possibly physical violence as well. BB UK has certainly had some examples yet they persist in pouring endless drink into the HMs . The overtly sexual behaviour of Frankie and Kirk was unpleasant and it was well dealt with by the females targeted. Perhaps Kirk will eventually learn that laying around being verbally offensive while scratching his genitals is unlikely to win the hearts of fair maidens even if in the world of TOWIE it is socially acceptable.
Voting and evictions seemed to raise peoples interest as always. Friday's double evictions of Kirk and Natalie had an overtone of Harry's eviction last series and the ever present spectre of FaceBook enabling voting scams is again in people's minds. It seemed the ideal time for someone to make some money by betting shrewdly. There were lots of people up as well - more than the 4 when Harry got the unexpected boot despite being 33/1. Perhaps last night's eviction was an aberration - but it was certainly an ideal time for an unexpected result perhaps because Natalie was about 3rd or 4th favourite to win.
It would be an understatement to say that surprise was expressed within the house and outside as well when Natalie went. So voting is still under suspicion and it remains blatantly unfair that phone voters pay more than 5 times the price of Facebook users anyway. It may have been designed to encourage Facebook 'social media interaction' but in reality Facebook users are Facebook users and phone users are phone users. The only likely effect is that phone users will feel even less inclined to vote because of dissatisfaction with the Facebook discount. It will be interesting to see the voting percentages when they are released to see if there is a change in the Facebook/phone ratio.
If I was of a suspicious mindset I would have said that Friday night's eviction was the one good chance they would get for a 'surprise' outcome in this series. Before now its been 1 v 1, and after now its running totals till the end.
Perhaps Natalie was a result of a shrewd bet and some good information on how the totals were standing and the very useful FaceBook block voting.
Perhaps we will never know.
What do we think of it so far then?
CBB is seen as a holiday camp - with free food and free booze aplenty. Fans are generally opposed to talking about nominations although it is popular with the housemates to a point. BB have certainly used it to their advantage this series - a rare well done C5, but its not BB as we know it. There is something of the night in all of Desmond's doings. There seems little doubt that they have a view about who they want to win but I don't know if they can control it anymore having let the genie out of the bottle with FaceBook voting. Desmond (Northern and Shell) is wholly about control and money - nothing else. I am sure he would like the LF money but his production team does not dare to risk losing control of story lines and outcomes. Even though Mr Desmond's newspapers are not subject to the Press Complaints Council (because he has withdrawn them) I suspect he does not want another Shetty shambles on his TV channels.
Perhaps Live Feed will make or break the next series.
Perhaps we are deluded in our attempts to change the programme back to what it could be and should be. Certainly we have not 'moved on'. The sad thing for Channel 5 is that we are right (and we and they know it) and they are wrong. The sad thing for us is that there is no real way that the Channel 5 owners and the BB production team are likely to have the balls to admit who is right and do something about it. Live Feed please BB. Not 45 minutes once an eviction BB. Live Feed means that; as near to 24/7 as you can manage. Then we will shut up. And if you would like to make the Social Media just an add on like it is in other countries that would be good. And if you were honest and did not cover things up we could believe you so that would be good too. And if someone has a valid point to make on Facebook and you disagree with it the correct response is to put your side - not delete the comments and block the poster.
Overall your tasks were a pretty good in places. Some of your Big Brothers were good. It does not have to be totally frenetic 24/7 to get us on-side. We like the longer tasks with real rewards or deprivation. We don't mind the quiet times and the conversations. And finally remember, we are the most loyal audience you could ever wish for but perhaps you would be well advised to have us inside the BB tent pissing out and not outside it pissing in.
